Peer Review Process

JIPENDIKA: Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran dan Pendidikan applies a double-blind peer review policy, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential to ensure objectivity in the evaluation process. Submitted manuscripts are sent to several reviewers who are experts in their respective fields, to be evaluated according to the journal’s guidelines and the characteristics of high-quality scholarly work. For articles requiring revision, the same reviewers will be asked to reassess the revised version to ensure the quality is sufficient.

JIPENDIKA: Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran dan Pendidikan is committed to maintaining high standards in the peer review process, while also enhancing efficiency and speed.

All research articles published in JIPENDIKA undergo a thorough review process with the following key characteristics:

  • All articles are reviewed by at least two reviewers who are qualified in the relevant field.

  • The final publication decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the review results.

  • The Managing Editor and Editorial Assistants provide administrative support that ensures the integrity of the peer review process, while also offering rapid response times and maximum efficiency for authors, reviewers, and editors.

  • The journal also benefits from a manuscript referral process that involves high-quality reviews from other established journals.

Peer Review for Referred Manuscripts:
The editors of JIPENDIKA will promptly decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred manuscripts based on the reviews and editorial insights from the supporting journal. In addition, editors may request further review if deemed necessary. Authors will be notified if further evaluation is required.

Peer Review for Original Submissions:
Articles submitted directly to JIPENDIKA undergo a full peer review process by at least two experts selected by the Editor-in-Chief in accordance with the relevant field of expertise. The Editor-in-Chief, or an assigned member of the Editorial Board, will make the final decision on whether a manuscript is accepted, rejected, or requires revision based on the reviewers’ comments and assessments.

Editors will ensure that each manuscript presents well-conducted research and that the conclusions drawn are supported by the data presented in the article. Assessment based on the level of priority or popularity of the topic is not the main factor in decision-making; however, each article must provide a meaningful new contribution or addition to the existing scientific literature.